Wednesday, March 25, 2009
NCAA Bracket Re-Cap
1) VCU over UCLA: Come on now, you Bruin fans were scared for a minute or 40.
2) Butler over LSU: 75-71 final score. Whew for the Tigers.
3) Western Kentucky over Illinois: Yes!!!!
4) Michigan over Clemson: Yes again!!!!!!
5) Siena over Ohio State: Yes!!!!!! times three
6) Utah St. over Marquette: NO!!!! but you have to give props to the point guard that came back from a broken foot in 3 weeks.
7) Xavier as my dark horse: Still a bucking bronco.
8) At least one 13 seed will win a game: Yes times four, Cleveland State over Wake Forest.
All of my thoroughbreds are still alive and most of the PAC 10 are no longer with us.
My final four is still in tact, and I assure you no matter what happens, this year's sweet 16 will be a sight to behold.
Good luck to all teams involved (especially those I picked to go to the Final Four). I am sure that the best/hottest team will win.
Congrats to OU, Syracuse, and the rest of the overrated teams I mentioned that are still fighting.
Has anyone seen my sunscreen? I have a Cactus League spring training game to catch.
Ahhhhh....................... the beauty of the most gorgeous sweet 16 party ever.
Thursday, March 19, 2009
2009 NCAA Mens' Baketball Tourney Predictions
Tuesday, March 17, 2009
March Sadness
The NCAA men's basketball tournament is supposed to be a celebration of the season past. The culmination is that a national champion will be crowned. The problem that I have with the current 65 team format instead of the 64 team format is that play-in game has been added.
That in and of itself is fine, but the criteria of the tournament is that the 30 or so conference champions receive an automatic bid. The question I have for the committee is why for the second year in a row, they have selected two conference champions to be a part of the "play in" game? These champions in years past would have been a lock to participate in the field of 64, now all of a sudden, two conferences are getting the shaft.
I would love for the NCAA to explain to me why the play in game is not between two of the last teams to make the tournament as say a 12 seed (i.e. Arizona, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Michigan). These teams did not meet the criteria of playing in the tournament, yet they are assured a three day rest.
The Hornets of Alabama State and the Eagles of Moorehead State, two conference champions should be quite upset at the committee's decision that makes them compete just to play the number one overall seed Louisville Cardinals.
This scenario disturbs me to say the least. I am hopeful that the NCAA Tournament Committee does not follow in the footsteps of the "BC Mess" that currently exists regarding men's football.
This process needs to be reviewed by next year at the latest.
Has anyone seen my number 2 pencil with the extra large eraser? I need to fill out my brackets.
Ahhhh the beauty of a bunch of suits determining the fate of young men's lives.
Friday, March 13, 2009
For those of us that drive 4x4's.........
Ahhh the beauty of gravity!!!!!!
Thursday, March 12, 2009
A March Madness Update
Thing I am sure of: There has never been a tournament where all four number one seeds have played together in the Final Four. This year will be no different. The NCAA is loaded with many talented basketball teams. So many, that there is no way all four one seeds will make it to the finals. Mark my words.
Thing I am pretty sure of: There will be at least two Big East teams that are awarded number one seeds.
Thing I feel good about: At least one number thirteen seed will win in the first round again this year.
Thing I am not too sure about: The Big East will have the best record of all conferences in the tournament.
Thing I would be better flipping a coin over: Oklahoma does not make it to the Sweet 16.
Thing I wouldn't bet a nickel on: A number sixteen seed wins it's opening round game for the first time in tournament history..........(I have a better chance of seeing God).
I will give my picks for the Final Four on Sunday night. This is going to be a disappointing day for many deserving teams (that's just a hunch).
Ahhh....the beauty of March Insanity.
Wednesday, March 4, 2009
NBA MVP debate
1) LeBron James: The powers that be in Cleveland have finally put a fair amount of talent around the King to allow him to thrive this year. That being said, this may have hurt the King's chances to win this year.
2) Kobe Bryant: I'm sorry, as far as I am concerned, Kobe has way too much talent around him to win the award this year. Between Gasol, Bynum, Odom, Walton et. al, Kobe should be nothing more than after thought in this discussion.
3) Dwayne Wade: The only true support cast that D Wade has this year is the rookie phenom Michael Beasley. Considering the lack of support he has, Wade County deserves to win the award this year with LeBron coming in a close second. If the voters had the ability to make a decision after the playoffs, the decision may be different, but they do not, so therefore my prediction stands.
D Wade 2009 NBA MVP......that is all.
Ahhhh.....the beauty of the battles on the hard wood.